Friday, February 24, 2012

Manifestation of the Evolution/Intelligent Design Debate in Public Education

Did you know that in the United States, the Supreme Court has ruled the teaching of creationism as science in public schools unconstitutional? Did you know that although many states allow the teaching of intelligent design, there are many lower courts that have deemed it unconstitutional?  You may ask yourself in the places in which both have been deemed unconstitutional, what is taught in the schools about how man came to be? Did we just land here as aliens from another planet? Why is it seemingly impossible to come to an agreement on how mankind is present on earth in its current state? These questions represent a only small portion of the controversial debate about the topics of evolution and creationism being taught in public schools.


In 1925, John Scopes was put to trial for daring to teach evolution in a high school science class. This trial became known as the Scopes Monkey Trial. Scopes was found guilty of violating Tennessee’s Butler Act, which states that teaching evolution in school is unconstitutional, but the conviction was overturned on a technicality. At the time of the trial there were modernists who said religion was consistent with evolution, and there were fundamentalists who said the word of God was more important than human knowledge. This was one of the first times that there was a nationwide debate of evolution versus creationism.

Image of the Newspaper Announcing Scopes Conviction

Since the Scopes Monkey Trial, a lot has changed in the evolution versus creationism debate and its presence in schools. Evolution is now taught all over the United States with limited controversy inside the class. Yet the battle remains outside of the classroom over the legal status of creation and evolution in the public school classroom. Regardless of the debate, I think it is important that students are made aware of the evolution, and the evidence that supports it. They don’t have to necessarily overturn their beliefs based on something their science teacher told them, but they should know the facts.  The facts are there. They should chose whether they want to believe them or not.

3 comments:

  1. I really enjoyed reading about the historical significance to the topic. The controversial debate seems to link back to the fact vs theory discussion we had in class. We should know the facts, but we can develop our own theories to explain those facts.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think that a major point to consider about the creationism that is being pushed right now is that it focuses on the Christian version of creation (At least that's what I have been exposed to). If we're going to play that game, wouldn't it make sense to teach about Pagan, Norse, Greek, Hindu, Tao, etc creation as well?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I really like your article Rachael! In a perfect world, both theories would be presented in textbooks and students would not be pressured to believe one theory over another. Addressing your article and Jim's comment, I can see why teaching creationism would be considered unconstitutional in a country where freedom of religion is supposed to be guaranteed. We can't expect to force Christianity-based ideals on those who practice other religions.

    ReplyDelete